TABLE 8
RBP METRIC COMPARISON
PINE CREEK, CRAWFORD AND WARREN COUNTIES
OCTOBER 16-19, 1995 AND APRIL 12-13, 2000
METRIC* | STATION 1PC |
STATION 3PC |
STATION 5PC |
STATION 7PC |
STATION 10CC |
STATION 12WB |
STATION 13WB |
STATION 15CC |
STATION 17CC |
STATION 19PC |
STATION R1 |
STATION R2 |
STATION R3 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | TAXA RICHNESS |
16
|
18
|
24
|
27
|
22
|
22
|
25
|
32
|
24
|
22
|
26
|
19
|
25
|
Cand/Ref (%) |
64
|
72
|
96
|
108
|
85
|
85
|
96
|
123
|
92
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
Biol. Cond. Score |
2
|
4
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
|
2. | MOD. EPT INDEX |
12
|
9
|
9
|
11
|
8
|
12
|
14
|
16
|
10
|
9
|
15
|
12
|
13
|
Cand/Ref (%) |
92
|
69
|
69
|
85
|
53
|
80
|
93
|
107
|
67
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
Biol. Cond. Score |
6
|
4
|
4
|
6
|
2
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
4
|
4
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
|
3. | MOD. HBI |
2.1
|
2.8
|
3.4
|
3.9
|
4.0
|
2.0
|
2.8
|
3.3
|
2.9
|
3.4
|
2.3
|
2.2
|
3.2
|
Cand-Ref |
<0
|
<0
|
0.2
|
0.7
|
1.7
|
<0
|
0.5
|
1.0
|
0.6
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
Biol. Cond. Score |
6
|
6
|
6
|
4
|
0
|
6
|
6
|
4
|
6
|
2
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
|
4. | % DOMINANT TAXA |
40
|
22
|
30
|
26
|
20
|
28
|
18
|
13
|
17
|
17
|
22
|
20
|
16
|
Cand-Ref |
24
|
6
|
14
|
10
|
<0
|
6
|
<0
|
<0
|
<0
|
<0
|
|
|
|
|
Biol. Cond. Score |
6**
|
6
|
4
|
4
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
|
5. | % MOD. MAYFLYS |
54
|
48
|
34
|
12
|
12
|
26
|
32
|
34
|
55
|
36
|
41
|
58
|
22
|
Ref-Cand |
<0
|
<0
|
<0
|
10
|
29
|
15
|
9
|
7
|
<0
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
Biol. Cond. Score |
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
2
|
4
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
2
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
|
TOTAL BIOLOGICAL CONDITION SCORE |
26
|
26
|
26
|
26
|
16
|
28
|
30
|
28
|
28
|
20
|
30
|
30
|
30
|
|
% COMPARABILITY TO REFERENCE |
87
|
87
|
87
|
87
|
53
|
93
|
100
|
93
|
93
|
67
|
|
|
|
* - Station 1PC, 3PC, 5PC, and 7PC compared to R3
* - Station 10CC, 12WB, 13WB, 15CC, and 17CC compared to R1
* - Station 19PC compared to R2
** - Based on the dominant taxon having a Hilsenhoff score less than 3
Return to the Pine Creek Page