METRIC1 | STATION 1CC |
STATION 2CC |
STATION 3WB |
STATION 4CC |
STATION 5UNT |
STATION 6CC |
STATION R1 |
STATION R2 |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | TAXA RICHNESS |
20
|
22
|
18
|
19
|
12
|
17
|
13
|
18
|
Cand/Ref (%) |
154
|
169
|
138
|
105
|
92
|
94
|
xxx
|
xxx
|
|
Biol. Cond. Score |
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
2. | MOD. EPT INDEX |
7
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
6
|
6
|
8
|
10
|
Cand/Ref (%) |
87
|
75
|
87
|
80
|
75
|
60
|
xxx
|
xxx
|
|
Biol. Cond. Score |
6
|
4
|
6
|
6
|
4
|
4
|
6
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
3. | MOD. HBI |
4.8
|
4.4
|
2.5
|
4.2
|
2.5
|
4.1
|
2.0
|
2.1
|
Cand-Ref |
2.8
|
2.4
|
0.5
|
2.1
|
0.5
|
2.0
|
xxx
|
xxx
|
|
Biol. Cond. Score |
0
|
0
|
6
|
0
|
6
|
0
|
6
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
4. | % DOMINANT TAXA |
34
|
20
|
52
|
45
|
43
|
36
|
38
|
46
|
Cand-Ref |
<0
|
<0
|
14
|
<0
|
5
|
<0
|
xxx
|
xxx
|
|
Biol. Cond. Score |
6
|
6
|
6*
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
5. | % MOD. MAYFLIES |
3
|
11
|
57
|
18
|
49
|
40
|
71
|
78
|
Ref-Cand |
68
|
60
|
14
|
60
|
22
|
38
|
xxx
|
xxx
|
|
Biol. Cond. Score |
0
|
0
|
4
|
0
|
2
|
2
|
6
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TOTAL BIOLOGICAL CONDITION SCORE |
18
|
16
|
28
|
18
|
24
|
18
|
30
|
30
|
|
% COMPARABILITY TO REFERENCE |
60
|
53
|
93
|
60
|
80
|
60
|
|
|
|
1 - Stations 1CC, 2CC, 3WB, and 5UNT compared
to R1 Stations 4CC and 6CC compared to R2 |
|||||||||
* - Dominant taxon with a Hilsenhoff score < 3 |
Return to the Crum Creek Page